· 6 issues
The November 1970 issue of HealthPAC Bulletin critiques the Nixon Administration's approach to health reform, highlighting a shift in the American Medical Association's (AMA) stance towards group practice and prepayment models. The editorial emphasizes the need for genuine reform in the healthcare system, arguing that the administration's focus on preventive care is a superficial response to a deeper crisis of medical inflation and access. It also discusses the growing demands from unions and consumer advocates for national health insurance, suggesting that the current conservative reforms are merely a strategy to control consumer demand rather than address systemic issues. The issue reflects a broader political context of rising healthcare costs and the struggle for equitable health services amidst increasing corporate influence in the medical sector.
The May 1973 issue of HealthPAC Bulletin focuses on the significant federal health cutbacks initiated by President Nixon, highlighting the broader economic crisis impacting domestic social programs. The editorial critiques the failures of Great Society health initiatives and argues for a more fundamental restructuring of the health system rather than merely opposing budget cuts. It emphasizes the need for health activists to build a strong constituency for comprehensive change, rather than settling for a defensive stance against cutbacks. The issue also discusses the implications of Nixon's policies on health care inflation and the dependency of health institutions on public funding, calling for accountability and control over health spending.
The May-June 1976 issue of HealthPAC Bulletin focuses on the National Health Planning and Resources Development Act of 1974, highlighting its complexities and the influence of special interests, particularly the American Medical Association (AMA) and hospital lobbies. The article critiques the Act's failure to effectively regulate health care costs and its convoluted provisions, which have led to varied interpretations and ineffective implementation. The issue also discusses the shifting dynamics between federal policymakers and health care providers, emphasizing the need for a robust health planning mechanism as a precursor to national health insurance.
This triple issue of the HealthPAC Bulletin focuses on the challenges faced by health systems agencies (HSAs) in controlling healthcare costs amidst a conservative political climate and budgetary constraints. It highlights the decline of the New York City Department of Health (NYCDOH) due to severe cuts in preventive and primary care services, exacerbated by the city's fiscal crisis and the shift towards a market-driven healthcare model. Notable articles discuss the implications of these changes on public health services and the ongoing struggle for community-based care alternatives, particularly in the context of mental health facilities in Washington, D.C.
The May-June 1980 issue of HealthPAC Bulletin focuses on the corporate malpractice in the asbestos industry, particularly highlighting Johns Manville's negligence towards worker health, as revealed by internal documents. It discusses the implications of President Carter's 1981 health budget, which threatens significant cuts to health services amidst rising inflation. Other notable articles address the Hyde Amendment's potential overturning, the return of OSHA regulations, and the growing issue of lead poisoning in children, emphasizing the need for stricter regulations on lead exposure. The issue reflects a broader concern for public health and corporate accountability during a politically charged era.
The November-December 1981 issue of HealthPAC Bulletin focuses on the privatization of public hospitals and the implications of for-profit healthcare systems. It critiques the increasing influence of private entities in healthcare, highlighting the need for accountability and equitable access to services. Notable articles discuss the role of voluntary hospitals and the impact of the Reagan administration's policies on health and safety regulations, particularly through OSHA's declining enforcement. The issue also touches on international health perspectives, including a letter advocating for coverage of Nicaragua's healthcare improvements post-revolution.